Skip to main content

The Supreme Court

Today in class we watched a video about the Supreme Court. It digs deeper into the Supreme Court and gave viewers an inside perspective to the justices who work there. Here's what I learned. 

The Supreme Court oversees the Appeal Court, who tries the law. When someone doesn't feel that they got a fair trial in Appeal Court, they take it to Supreme Court. Because the Supreme Court is certiorari, in which it has the power to pick and choose which cases it will take to trial, many cases are denied. In order to decide which cases they'd like to pursue and which ones they won't, the justices meet in a conference room and privately discuss with one another. Once their discussion is over and they've come to an overall decision, the judges send their opinion statements-explaining the legal reasons for the decision- in. Their opinion statements are revised and released to the press. 

I also learned about the major role that John Marshall played in introducing judicial review in the Supreme Court. Judicial Review gives the power of the court to review all actions in all parts of government and deem them constitutional or not. This is a large part of what the Supreme Court is today, so without John Marshall, they would have no judicial review. 


To sum it up, the Supreme Court's job is to interpret our 200 year old constitution and apply it to today's problems. My favorite quote from the video was from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. When discussing the constitution and what it meant when it was written compared to what it means now, Ginsburg states, "We don't have the constitution that was written in 1787 or 1791 when the Bill of Rights was added... remember that 'We the people' was composed of a very small part of the people in fact, inhabiting these shores. No woman could vote, people were held in bondage, Native Americans were not treated as citizens of equal stature and dignity. So, those people do count among 'We the people' our constitution embraces today." 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Glory

A few days ago in my seminar class, we watched a movie called "Glory". "Glory" depicts the story of the 54th Infantry Regiment in Massachusetts during the American Civil War. It shows the difficult and at times, uncomfortable story of the transition from slave to soldier. The men may have freed themselves from slavery, but they have yet to be free from the stigma that slavery created around them.  This movie was packed with tons of significant moments but I think my favorite was when Robert Shaw (played by Matthew Broderick) decided to take matters into his own hands when acquiring supplies for his soldiers. The men were denied basic attire like socks, shoes, and military uniforms due to the racial discrimination that they were still facing. Shaw wouldn't stand for it anymore and went to talk to the man in charge of attire. I think this is a great representation of what white people need to be doing in America right now. They need to use their privilege to upli...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Jim Crow Era and Brown v. The Board

Today in seminar I learned about two things: Brown v. Board and the Jim Crow Era. It was weird to learn about some of these things, because they seem so inhumane and so outdated. But the truth is that some of these things are still very much present in this country, such as blackface, a rising topic in media and entertainment, and lynchings, something that is still happening today in the midst of the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement.  Lynchings started occurring in the late 1870's and continued to occur for almost a hundred years. It was used as a form of punishment for black people who committed any type of social aggression, ranging from an accusation of a crime to something as small as bumping into a white woman, and the accuses weren't even given due process. Because white people didn't feel as if the law was working, they took the law into their own hands. The people that were responsible for these crimes were never charged or arrested. There was a total of abou...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Pro-Slavery Expressive Acts

Today in class I learned about the pro-slavery movement and the events that contributed to it. Here are a few things I learned:  The Fugitive Slave Act  was a set of two laws that were put into place in 1793 and 1850 that essentially allowed the capture and return of a fleeing slave. The first act was passed to give the locals authority to capture and return a slave, but the second one was passed to help the south retain their slave supply. This set of acts was passed to increase the division between the north and the south. Because the north wasn't as supportive of slavery, many slaves fled the south to the north where they could live and roam freely. But with the new act passed, it was now the north's obligation as legal citizens to contribute to slavery. This act was really the south's strategy to manipulate the north into going against its morals. The two acts were repealed on June 28th, 1864.     Another pro-slavery expressive act I learned about what the M...
Post a Comment
Read more